google.com, pub-2854092070981561, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0 History thru Hollywood: May 2014

Search This Blog

Saturday, May 31, 2014

The Vietnam War Soldier's Poetry

The poetry written about the Vietnam War displayed conflicts felt by the soldiers who lived through the experience. For example, this line from "Saigon Cemetery" by D.C. Berry, a medical officer who served in Cam Ranh Bay:  “Something to make a tongue tough enough to taste the full flavor of beauty and grief” oozes conflict as the words “beauty” and “grief” are at odds with each other within the same line. However, the poetry in general appears to try to convey to the American public the realities of the war, revealing that the American public was generally oblivious to the internal conflicts experienced by our soldiers. The analogy that “war is hell” has been used before, but the poem, “A Bummer” actually states that hell would be a better place to be than on a rice farm in Vietnam: “If you have a farm in Vietnam And a house in hell Sell the farm And go home.”  Furthermore, in the poem “Imagine,” we can clearly see the author attempting to relate the experiences of the war to the American public. Although they asked the questions, “what had it been like,” the author struggles with relating that information effectively.  In reality, the gap between those who lived through the experience and those who did not cannot be completely bridged. The poetry is an attempt for those to understand, but, again, the conflict appears in this gap.

Although in a war, the obvious conflict is between the two ideologies and/or nations fighting within it, but the Vietnam War also brought new and unforeseen problems that had never been faced before. The fact that the American public was either oblivious to the war or completely against the United States’ participation in the war was a new concept. Soldiers who were drafted and served in Vietnam were faced with their own inner conflict regarding the morality of the war which was compounded by the fact that much of the public who cared at all believed the United States did not belong in Vietnam. In addition, the veterans who had served in World War II and even in the Korean conflict were struggling with a new style of warfare which was not only frustrating but often-thought of as immoral. These conflicts brought about much psychological challenges for these soldiers, which can be best understood through their literature. However, the difficulties these soldiers faced can never be completely understood by someone who did not live through it, but the literature can provide some psychological insight into the problematic issues faced by those involved in the Vietnam War  if the audience is conscious enough to look for these clues.

Thursday, May 29, 2014

Vietnam and the Popular Novel



 Many popular culture pieces were created about the Vietnam War, from movies, television series, books, novels, poetry, and songs, revealing our obsession with trying to understand the conflict. Some of these pieces, especially the novels written by Tim O’Brien, convey the inner conflicts of the soldiers involved in a questionable war, actually getting as close to realism as possible through fiction. Many people could not understand what the soldiers experienced in Vietnam, especially those of the older generation who had lived through World War II with its clear goal to stop the evils of fascism. Vietnam was different in this respect as the goals were misguided and the public was misled, even if unintentionally. 

          Tim O’Brien’s protagonist in If I Die in a Combat Zone he contemplates the idea of departing for Canada instead of reporting for duty when he receives his draft notice. From the first sentence, “The summer of 1968, the summer I turned into a soldier, was a good time for talking about war and peace,” we can see the conflict within O’Brien’s character beginning to build. O’Brien’s character is drafted this summer, and he is clearly against this particular war. Although he states that “since it [the war] was wrong and since people were dying as a result of it, it was evil,” he still doubted his own principles because there were no clear answers as to what Americans were fighting for and what the end result would bring for Vietnam, or America for that matter. He is, therefore, not just conflicted because he is being asked to fight in a war he does not support, but he questions his own values and ethics regarding this war. Summing up his internal conflict, O’Brien’s character states, “The war, I thought, was wrongly conceived and poorly justified. But perhaps I was mistaken, and who really knew, anyway?”

   
      Tim O’Brien also related the conflicts within the American soldier through his character Paul Berlin in Going After Cacciato. Berlin was sent to Chu Lai’s Combat Center, but he had “never heard of I Corps, or the Americal, or Chu Lai.” In fact, several times, Berlin admits he is “lost.” Although he was probably “lost” in the directional sense, it would appear he was lost in the emotional sense as well. Berlin seemed to be torn between being a member of the American public back on the mainland and being a U.S. soldier in a foreign country. “The homefront” as Berlin called it when he wrote to his father from Chu Lai, seemed to be “a nice unfrightened” place, a place he would rather be. He again repeats to his father that he is “a little lost.” Although he follows orders and learns from the Combat Center, it becomes obvious that Berlin is not entirely at peace with his being a soldier fighting a questionable war in a strange place.

         
Because this was a strange place, and the war was not fought on the traditional “front,” the war itself was confusing causing more conflicts within the soldiers, even those who had been veteran soldiers and defended their country in war without question. For example, Beaupre in David Halberstam’s One Very Hot Day found himself negatively comparing Vietnam to World War II. He found “the endless walking each day… with nothing done, nothing seen, nothing accomplished, nothing changed, just hiking each day with death, taking chances for so very little, wondering if he were going to be sold out, wondering whom you could trust” an extremely frustrating problem that he had not faced in World War II. This clearly causes conflict within Beaupre because he does not have a concrete moral sense as to the success or failure of each day within the context of the war. Beaupre sums this up with the statement, “Yes was no longer exactly yes, no was no longer exactly no, maybe was more certainly maybe.”

           
Even in the early, gung-ho literature of The Green Berets conflict was prevalent from the old style of warfare to the new, questioning morality and the American value system. Lieutenant Colonel Train was an officer in the Special Forces division, which engaged in an unorthodox warfare style within the early years of the Vietnam conflict. As a matter of fact, Robin Moore made a statement regarding the change in warfare style: “President Kennedy’s awareness of the importance of this facet of the military had made unconventional or special warfare experience a must for any officer who wanted to advance to the top echelons.” Train, although an officer in Special Forces, represents the more traditional value system of warfare, and “did not accept wholeheartedly the doctrines of unconventional warfare.” Moore's foil character, Kornie, on the other hand, embraces the Special Forces doctrine of unconventional warfare and even crosses the line in order to get things done. The conflict between these two characters easily represents the changes about to come in a new style of warfare in Vietnam and the difficulties soldiers, especially veterans, faced when immersed in the Vietnam War.

         
These are merely a few of many novels written in the wake of Vietnam, the most well-known of which is Tim O'Brien's The Things They Carried, which has become a new classic of sorts, read in high school classrooms, helping the public understand that what the grunts "carried" was far more than the physical equipment, but, rather, the conflict itself. The Things They Carried is a personal favorite and a must-read in order to understand the Vietnam soldiers' experience as much as possible having not lived through it ourselves.

Wednesday, May 28, 2014

The Legacy of Vietnam

            Each conflict in our nation’s history has left a legacy in its wake.  The American Revolution was a fight for freedom from imperialist England; the Civil War was a fight about slavery, pitting brother against brother; World War I was fought to make the world safe for democracy; World War II was a fight to protect the world from Hitler and fascism.  But why did we fight the Vietnam War?  This conflict was different from those wars past, as the underlying cause of our involvement is not as clear and concise, especially in light of the fact that our leadership mistakenly believed at the time that we were fighting to protect the world from Communism when in fact the Vietnamese fight was for independence and unity.  From the beginning of the U.S. involvement, the policies were unclear and our goals and achievements were misconstrued and misrepresented.  The legacy left by the Vietnam conflict, then, is the tragedy of misunderstandings and misrepresentations.
            The next few entries will explore how we, as Americans, try to reconciled the legacy of Vietnam with the reality, a reality that could not be distinguished from fantasy.  Many different types of pop culture offerings tried to justify American involvement in Vietnam while others merely sought to heal the wounds and bring closure.  What worked?  What didn't? And what changed Americans' perception of the Vietnam War? Further, what was real?  And what furthered the fantasies?  Pop culture has fed a popular memory of the Vietnam War which influences how Americans view that war, even today.